RESCUE Muni listserv - Re: Digest fare increases

richard petersen (zpub@sirius.com)
Wed, 14 Jan 1998 11:57:29 -0800

I agree with Marc Norton about fare increases.

If Rescue Muni is wondering why more people do not want to become members
this just might be why. If this is true about the Steering Committee, I
wonder where their heads are.

I have questioned in some of the meetings I have attended the
appropriateness of such a complex organizational structure for such a small
organization. It seems to me the most appropriate way for an organization
to grow is to evolve over time a structure which best fits the
organization. Right now I am an advocate for an anarchistic structure
(basically none). After all, this is not the Sierra Club and needs to be a
vital grass roots organization if it is to attract to support of riders.
Frankly, I see riders turned off by the petty power structure of Rescue
Muni.

Richard

----------
>
> From: Marc Norton <nortonsf@ix.netcom.com>
> Subject: Rescue Muni supports fare increase?
>
> Members and supporters of Rescue Muni should know that the
> Rescue Muni Steering Committee voted AGAINST the following
> policy statement at its January 12 meeting:
>
> "The policy of Rescue Muni is no increase in fares
> at this time."
>
> The vote was 3 in favor, 4 against.
>
> Rescue Muni co-founder George Musser was recently quoted in the
> press saying that he would lie down on the tracks if Muni tried
> to push through a fare increase at this time. Unfortunately,
> George wasn't at the January 12 Steering Committee meeting.
>
> One would think that opposing unnecessary and unwarranted fare
> increases would be a no-brainer for an organization whose
> justification for existence is the of support public transportation.
> But not so. Apparently keeping public transportation affordable
> for the thousands of San Franciscans who have no choice but to
> depend on Muni isn't an issue for certain members of the Steering
> Committee.
>
> (At this same meeting, the Steering Committee REJECTED, by a vote
> of 0 to 4, any support for making the downtown crowd pay its fare
> share for Muni through the establishment of a downtown transit
> assessment district.)
>
> Clean out the riders pockets, and let downtown off scot-free...
> Is this really what Rescue Muni has become?
>
> Actually, both of these policy decisions by the Steering Committee
> are completely contrary to the positions advocated by the
> Governance Committee, which spent the last two months discussing
> and debating Muni funding issues. More importantly, it is highly
> doubtful that many rank-and-file Rescue Muni members and
> supporters would find fare increases acceptable at this time.
>
> I think that the discussion of fare increases and Muni funding
> should be broadened to include the general membership of
> Rescue Muni, which is (or at least should be) the real
> policy-making body of Rescue Muni. To this end, I have
> suggested to the Steering Committee that some time be set aside
> at the next general membership meeting for a discussion about
> fare increases and Muni funding.
>
> I also propose that the next general membership meeting adopt the
> following resolution:
>
> "It is the policy of Rescue Muni to oppose any fare increases
> at this time."
>
I agree

>
> -Marc Norton
>